Smt. Lakshmi Bai alias Manjulabai W/o. Gopal Naik Lambani vs L.Gopal Naik S/o. Lalasingha Naik Lamani — 439/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/sec.125(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAVN400010152026

Filing Number

439/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

439/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI

Judge

172-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/sec.125(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Lakshmi Bai alias Manjulabai W/o. Gopal Naik Lambani

    Adv. BANNIMATI SHIVANANDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.L.Gopal Naik S/o. Lalasingha Naik Lamani

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    In Crl.Misc.No.439/2026, the Court closed the petition as fully satisfied after the respondent paid Rs.60,000 to the petitioner through counsel. The petitioner's advocate filed a joint memorandum confirming receipt of the entire petition amount and requesting case closure, which the JMFC Hadagali granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  4. 27-May-2026

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  5. 22-May-2026

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 439/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Crl.Misc.No.439/2026, the Court closed the petition as fully satisfied after the respondent paid Rs.60,000 to the petitioner through counsel. The petitioner's advocate filed a joint memorandum confirming receipt of the entire petition amount and requesting case closure, which the JMFC Hadagali granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case