The President, Kuruvatti Basaveshwara Padayatre Seva Samithi, Chowkipete, Davanageri vs Ittagi Shivanagappa — 68/2018
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section us. Status: EVIDENCE-C. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN400008362018
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
68/2018
Filing Date
05-07-2018
Registration No
68/2018
Registration Date
05-07-2018
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI
Judge
172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The President, Kuruvatti Basaveshwara Padayatre Seva Samithi, Chowkipete, Davanageri
Adv. S SURESH MUDIMALLAPPA
Respondent(s)
Ittagi Shivanagappa
K Basavarajappa
Patil Kalanagouda
Hearing History
Judge: 172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 06-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 17-10-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 04-09-2025 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's interim application (IA No.3) and granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from undertaking any construction on the disputed property until final disposal of the suit. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and irreparable loss would result from construction activities. The defendant's counsel conceded he would not attempt construction pending suit disposal, and the case was adjourned for further examination of the plaintiff's witness by 11.02.2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's interim application (IA No.3) and granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from undertaking any construction on the disputed property until final disposal of the suit. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and irreparable loss would result from construction activities. The defendant's counsel conceded he would not attempt construction pending suit disposal, and the case was adjourned for further examination of the plaintiff's witness by 11.02.2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts