Shiranahalli Sharanappa S/o. Ningappa R/o.Magala village vs Smt. Kampli Manjula W/o. Kampli Rajappa R/o. Magala village — 52/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/o.VII,Rule,1,2,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAVN400005102026

Filing Number

51/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

52/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI

Judge

172-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/o.VII,Rule,1,2,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shiranahalli Sharanappa S/o. Ningappa R/o.Magala village

    Adv. KERALLI MANJUNATHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Kampli Manjula W/o. Kampli Rajappa R/o. Magala village

  2. 2.Smt. Nagannara Basamma W/o. Koteppa R/o.Magala Village

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The Lok-Adalath Court at Hadagali decreed a suit for declaration, possession, and permanent injunction based on a compromise petition voluntarily accepted by both parties. The court found the compromise was not against public policy and enforceable, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Report

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok-Adalath Court at Hadagali decreed a suit for declaration, possession, and permanent injunction based on a compromise petition voluntarily accepted by both parties. The court found the compromise was not against public policy and enforceable, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case