Sri Govindappanavara Honnappa vs Govindappanavara Venkatesh — 72/2014

Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section U/o7rule1and2CPC. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAVN400005052014

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

Filing Number

73/2014

Filing Date

09-07-2014

Registration No

72/2014

Registration Date

09-07-2014

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI

Judge

172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.

Acts & Sections

Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section U/o7rule1and2CPC

Petitioner(s)

Sri Govindappanavara Honnappa

Adv. S SURESH MUDIMALLAPPA

Respondent(s)

Govindappanavara Venkatesh

Govindappanvara Durugavva

Govindappanavara Huggeppa

Govindappanvara Honnappa

Govindappanvar Siddappa

Hearing History

Judge: 172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

20-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

09-01-2026

EVIDENCE-C

11-12-2025

Awaiting Report

04-12-2025

Awaiting Report

Interim Orders

19-09-2015
Deposition
07-12-2015
Deposition
27-08-2016
Issue
23-11-2016
Deposition
11-08-2017
Deposition
19-09-2024
Deposition
20-02-2026
Deposition

In O.S. No. 72/2014 DW.1, dated 20-02-2026, the court admitted two documentary exhibits into evidence: a birth certificate for Poojar Lakkappa issued by the Head Master of Gove High School Haravi (though filed without a passport-size photograph), and an online copy of a pension sanction order issued by the Deputy Tahasildar of Hirehadagali Hobli. The court found that the defendant's evidence did not establish the required proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In O.S. No. 72/2014 DW.1, dated 20-02-2026, the court admitted two documentary exhibits into evidence: a birth certificate for Poojar Lakkappa issued by the Head Master of Gove High School Haravi (though filed without a passport-size photograph), and an online copy of a pension sanction order issued by the Deputy Tahasildar of Hirehadagali Hobli. The court found that the defendant's evidence did not establish the required proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case