Pujari Umesh Naik S/o. Bheemanaik, vs Smt. L.Rupli Bai W/o. Samyanaik alias Nemyanaik — 40/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.VII,Rule,1,2,R/w,Sec.26,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN400002882026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
39/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI
Judge
172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pujari Umesh Naik S/o. Bheemanaik,
Adv. S H CHABBI
Respondent(s)
Smt. L.Rupli Bai W/o. Samyanaik alias Nemyanaik
Smt.LManjyanaik S/o. Samyanaik alias Nemyanaik
L.Rekyanaik S/o. Samanaik alias Nemyanaik
Smt. L.Lakshmi Bai alias Anithabai W/o. Shivunaik D/o. Samyanaik alias Nemyanaik,
Hearing History
Judge: 172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
Disposed
FOR SETTLEMENT
FOR SETTLEMENT
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR SETTLEMENT | |
| 12-03-2026 | FOR SETTLEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 29-01-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Lok-Adalath Court at Hadagali accepted a compromise petition between the plaintiff and defendant in a property dispute involving declaration, possession, and permanent injunction. The court decreed the suit in terms of the agreed compromise, finding it voluntary, not against public policy, and with no adverse impact on legal heirs. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Lok-Adalath Court at Hadagali accepted a compromise petition between the plaintiff and defendant in a property dispute involving declaration, possession, and permanent injunction. The court decreed the suit in terms of the agreed compromise, finding it voluntary, not against public policy, and with no adverse impact on legal heirs. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts