Neeraligi Parashuramappa S/o. Late Ningappa, vs Dasanahalli Basappa S/o. Dasanahalli Hanumappa — 35/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.VII,Rule,1,2,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAVN400002772026

Filing Number

34/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI

Judge

172-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.VII,Rule,1,2,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Neeraligi Parashuramappa S/o. Late Ningappa,

    Adv. KERALLI MANJUNATHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dasanahalli Basappa S/o. Dasanahalli Hanumappa

  2. 2.Belavigi Channabasappa S/o. Laxmappa

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The Lok-Adalath Bench at Hadagali accepted a compromise petition between plaintiffs and defendants in a partition and separate possession suit (OS No. 35/2026). The court found the compromise agreement was voluntarily accepted by both parties, not against public policy or law, and decreed the suit in accordance with the compromise terms, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok-Adalath Bench at Hadagali accepted a compromise petition between plaintiffs and defendants in a partition and separate possession suit (OS No. 35/2026). The court found the compromise agreement was voluntarily accepted by both parties, not against public policy or law, and decreed the suit in accordance with the compromise terms, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case