Veeramma D/o Late Chikkagoudra Chandrappa W/o Gundagatthi Veeranna vs Gouramma @ Lalithamma D/o Late Chikkagoudra Chandrappa W/o Gurusiddappa Kugali — 125/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,Rule,1,2,. Status: WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAVN310017092024

WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

128/2024

Filing Date

16-10-2024

Registration No

125/2024

Registration Date

16-10-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI

Judge

1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 7,Rule,1,2,

Petitioner(s)

Veeramma D/o Late Chikkagoudra Chandrappa W/o Gundagatthi Veeranna

Adv. Karibasappa S

Respondent(s)

Gouramma @ Lalithamma D/o Late Chikkagoudra Chandrappa W/o Gurusiddappa Kugali

Hearing History

Judge: 1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

07-03-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C

20-02-2026

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

24-01-2026

JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER

19-12-2025

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

05-12-2025

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

Interim Orders

14-03-2025
Deposition
20-02-2026
Orders

Summary: In OS No. 125/2024, the court allowed the plaintiff's Interlocutory Application (IA No.8) to add proposed defendants No.4 to 6 (purchasers of disputed property Sy.No.210/C) as necessary parties to the suit. The court found these proposed defendants to be necessary parties since any decree passed regarding the property would affect them, while keeping open the liberty for all defendants to raise contentions regarding limitation and the validity of the 2007 sale deed. The plaintiff is directed to amend the plaint and submit it by 07.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In OS No. 125/2024, the court allowed the plaintiff's Interlocutory Application (IA No.8) to add proposed defendants No.4 to 6 (purchasers of disputed property Sy.No.210/C) as necessary parties to the suit. The court found these proposed defendants to be necessary parties since any decree passed regarding the property would affect them, while keeping open the liberty for all defendants to raise contentions regarding limitation and the validity of the 2007 sale deed. The plaintiff is directed to amend the plaint and submit it by 07.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case