Smt.Vaddra Giddamma W/o Late Vaddra Maliyappa vs Banakara Basavaraj S/o B.Kotrappa — 16/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41,Rule,1,2. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

R.A. - Regular Appeals

CNR: KAVN310013922024

Filing Number

16/2024

Filing Date

28-Aug-2024

Registration No

16/2024

Registration Date

28-Aug-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI

Judge

1213-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 41,Rule,1,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt.Vaddra Giddamma W/o Late Vaddra Maliyappa

    Adv. C Basavaraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Banakara Basavaraj S/o B.Kotrappa

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: RA 16/2024 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment ordering specific performance of a property sale contract. The court found the defendant's contentions unproven due to her failure to cross-examine witnesses or present evidence, despite being given multiple opportunities. Citing the Supreme Court principle from *Sarwan Singh v. State of Punjab*, the court held that when a party declines to cross-examine opposing witnesses, their evidence must be accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Judgment/Final Order

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgment/Final Order

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  10. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence-C

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  11. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence-C

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  12. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence-C

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  13. 21-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  14. 11-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  15. 09-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  16. 12-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  17. 18-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  18. 04-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  19. 16-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  20. 05-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  21. 19-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  22. 01-Oct-2024

    First Hearing/Cognizance(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  23. 26-Sep-2024

    First Hearing/Cognizance(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District

  24. 29-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 28-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RA 16/2024 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment ordering specific performance of a property sale contract. The court found the defendant's contentions unproven due to her failure to cross-examine witnesses or present evidence, despite being given multiple opportunities. Citing the Supreme Court principle from *Sarwan Singh v. State of Punjab*, the court held that when a party declines to cross-examine opposing witnesses, their evidence must be accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case