Aravali Abinava Son of Late Aravali Veerappa vs Poojari Kotramma Wife of Pojjari Veerappa — 85/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ,7,rule,26,of,CPC. Status: ISSUES-C. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAVN310013642018

ISSUES-C

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

85/2018

Filing Date

27-06-2018

Registration No

85/2018

Registration Date

27-06-2018

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI

Judge

1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section ,7,rule,26,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

Aravali Abinava Son of Late Aravali Veerappa

Adv. H.Biddappa

Respondent(s)

Poojari Kotramma Wife of Pojjari Veerappa

Hearing History

Judge: 1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

28-03-2026

ISSUES-C

07-03-2026

FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR)

06-02-2026

SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)

17-01-2026

SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)

05-12-2025

SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)

Interim Orders

20-07-2019
Deposition
13-09-2019
Deposition
07-12-2019
Deposition
03-03-2023
Deposition
03-06-2023
Deposition
05-08-2023
Deposition

Court Order Summary Case: O.S. 85/2018 | Date: 05-08-2023 | Language: Kannada Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's challenge to a property partition and related disputes involving multiple defendants under Section 103 of the CPC. The court upheld the previous orders, including the dismissal of various objections filed between 2004-2010, and found no merit in the arguments regarding the alleged improper partition of a 30×40 property valued at Rs. 4-5 lakhs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: O.S. 85/2018 | Date: 05-08-2023 | Language: Kannada Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's challenge to a property partition and related disputes involving multiple defendants under Section 103 of the CPC. The court upheld the previous orders, including the dismissal of various objections filed between 2004-2010, and found no merit in the arguments regarding the alleged improper partition of a 30×40 property valued at Rs. 4-5 lakhs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case