Minor Tarun S/o Late Rangappa, Rpt by his mother Gowramma vs Vishalakshi W/o Late Rangappa — 46/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order,7,Rule,1,R/W,Sec,26. Status: FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAVN310004302023

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

47/2023

Filing Date

21-04-2023

Registration No

46/2023

Registration Date

23-05-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI

Judge

1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order,7,Rule,1,R/W,Sec,26

Petitioner(s)

Minor Tarun S/o Late Rangappa, Rpt by his mother Gowramma

Adv. S.Shreenivas

Respondent(s)

Vishalakshi W/o Late Rangappa

Hearing History

Judge: 1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

06-03-2026

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

20-02-2026

FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR)

31-01-2026

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

03-01-2026

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

02-01-2026

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

Interim Orders

19-07-2025
Orders

Case Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' Interim Application No. 4 seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from applying for compassionate appointment following a PWD employee's death. The judge held that the plaintiffs, as children of the deceased's second wife, failed to establish a prima facie case, citing Supreme Court precedent that such children have limited inheritance rights. The court ruled that compassionate appointment decisions fall within government discretion and cannot be restrained by court order. The main suit is scheduled for issues on 16.08.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' Interim Application No. 4 seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from applying for compassionate appointment following a PWD employee's death. The judge held that the plaintiffs, as children of the deceased's second wife, failed to establish a prima facie case, citing Supreme Court precedent that such children have limited inheritance rights. The court ruled that compassionate appointment decisions fall within government discretion and cannot be restrained by court order. The main suit is scheduled for issues on 16.08.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case