Minor Tarun S/o Late Rangappa, Rpt by his mother Gowramma vs Vishalakshi W/o Late Rangappa — 46/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order,7,Rule,1,R/W,Sec,26. Status: FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN310004302023
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
47/2023
Filing Date
21-04-2023
Registration No
46/2023
Registration Date
23-05-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI
Judge
1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Minor Tarun S/o Late Rangappa, Rpt by his mother Gowramma
Adv. S.Shreenivas
Respondent(s)
Vishalakshi W/o Late Rangappa
Hearing History
Judge: 1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C
FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR)
FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C
FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C
FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C |
| 20-02-2026 | FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR) |
| 31-01-2026 | FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C |
| 03-01-2026 | FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C |
| 02-01-2026 | FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' Interim Application No. 4 seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from applying for compassionate appointment following a PWD employee's death. The judge held that the plaintiffs, as children of the deceased's second wife, failed to establish a prima facie case, citing Supreme Court precedent that such children have limited inheritance rights. The court ruled that compassionate appointment decisions fall within government discretion and cannot be restrained by court order. The main suit is scheduled for issues on 16.08.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' Interim Application No. 4 seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from applying for compassionate appointment following a PWD employee's death. The judge held that the plaintiffs, as children of the deceased's second wife, failed to establish a prima facie case, citing Supreme Court precedent that such children have limited inheritance rights. The court ruled that compassionate appointment decisions fall within government discretion and cannot be restrained by court order. The main suit is scheduled for issues on 16.08.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts