Loki Bai W/o Late Shantha Naik vs Pandu Naik S/o Late Vasannya Naik — 22/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order,7,Rule,1,and,2,R/W,Sec,26. Status: FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAVN310001832020

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

Next Hearing

04th April 2026

Filing Number

22/2020

Filing Date

16-03-2020

Registration No

22/2020

Registration Date

16-03-2020

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI

Judge

1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order,7,Rule,1,and,2,R/W,Sec,26

Petitioner(s)

Loki Bai W/o Late Shantha Naik

Adv. PATIL PRASHANTH

Respondent(s)

Pandu Naik S/o Late Vasannya Naik

Hearing History

Judge: 1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

06-03-2026

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

13-02-2026

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

31-01-2026

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

17-01-2026

FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR)

03-01-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

25-11-2023
Deposition
09-02-2024
Deposition
01-03-2024
Deposition
29-06-2024
Deposition
25-10-2024
Deposition
16-11-2024
Deposition
06-12-2024
Deposition
21-02-2025
Deposition
19-04-2025
Deposition
05-07-2025
Deposition

Summary This is an Original Suit (O.S. No. 22/2020) order from a Karnataka court dated 05.07.2025. The court's judgment addresses a property dispute involving approximately 26.62 acres of land, with the petitioner claiming ownership rights over 4 acres. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, ordering that the 4 acres of land be restored to the petitioner's possession and declaring the petitioner as the lawful owner of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is an Original Suit (O.S. No. 22/2020) order from a Karnataka court dated 05.07.2025. The court's judgment addresses a property dispute involving approximately 26.62 acres of land, with the petitioner claiming ownership rights over 4 acres. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, ordering that the 4 acres of land be restored to the petitioner's possession and declaring the petitioner as the lawful owner of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case