Idli Sanna Ningamma W/o Late Sanna Bharamappa vs Renukavva W/o Ramappa D/o Late Idli Dodda Bharamappa — 12/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order,7,Rule,1,and,2,R/W,sec,26. Disposed: Contested--DECREED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN310001412020
Filing Number
13/2020
Filing Date
26-02-2020
Registration No
12/2020
Registration Date
26-02-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI
Judge
1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Idli Sanna Ningamma W/o Late Sanna Bharamappa
Adv. PATIL PRASHANTH
Respondent(s)
Renukavva W/o Ramappa D/o Late Idli Dodda Bharamappa
Hearing History
Judge: 1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Disposed
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER |
| 30-01-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER |
| 23-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 17-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Case: OS.No.12/2020 | Court of Itinerary Senior Civil Judge, Huvinahadagali | Judgment: 06.03.2026 Decision: The court decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The court found that the suit properties are ancestral joint family properties and that the plaintiffs, as members of the Hindu joint family, are entitled to partition. Each plaintiff is entitled to 1/6th share out of 1/3rd share of Late Idli Sanna Bharamappa's ancestral property. The defendants' claim of a prior partition through an unregistered deed (palupatti) of 2008 was rejected, as was the defendant's assertion that mutation changes were made in accordance with that deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary Case: OS.No.12/2020 | Court of Itinerary Senior Civil Judge, Huvinahadagali | Judgment: 06.03.2026 Decision: The court decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The court found that the suit properties are ancestral joint family properties and that the plaintiffs, as members of the Hindu joint family, are entitled to partition. Each plaintiff is entitled to 1/6th share out of 1/3rd share of Late Idli Sanna Bharamappa's ancestral property. The defendants' claim of a prior partition through an unregistered deed (palupatti) of 2008 was rejected, as was the defendant's assertion that mutation changes were made in accordance with that deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts