M.Kuppanna S/o. Late Gopalappa vs M.Narayanappa S/o. Late Rangappa — 1/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order,41,Rule,1,and,2,Sec,151. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAVN310000642024
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
1/2024
Filing Date
19-01-2024
Registration No
1/2024
Registration Date
19-01-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI
Judge
1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Kuppanna S/o. Late Gopalappa
Adv. PATIL PRASHANTH
Respondent(s)
M.Narayanappa S/o. Late Rangappa
Hearing History
Judge: 1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C
FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 24-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 19-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
| 22-11-2025 | FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C |
| 25-10-2025 | FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the interim application (IA No.1) filed by appellant Sri. M. Kuppanna seeking condonation of a 394-day delay in filing an appeal against the dismissal of his partition suit (OS No.12/2012) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court held that the appellant, a 72-year-old senior citizen, had established sufficient grounds for condonation, particularly considering the substantial property rights at stake, and the case has been posted for arguments on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the interim application (IA No.1) filed by appellant Sri. M. Kuppanna seeking condonation of a 394-day delay in filing an appeal against the dismissal of his partition suit (OS No.12/2012) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court held that the appellant, a 72-year-old senior citizen, had established sufficient grounds for condonation, particularly considering the substantial property rights at stake, and the case has been posted for arguments on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts