M.Kuppanna S/o. Late Gopalappa vs M.Narayanappa S/o. Late Rangappa — 1/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order,41,Rule,1,and,2,Sec,151. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAVN310000642024
Filing Number
1/2024
Filing Date
19-Jan-2024
Registration No
1/2024
Registration Date
19-Jan-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI
Judge
1213-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M.Kuppanna S/o. Late Gopalappa
Adv. PATIL PRASHANTH
Respondent(s)
-
1.M.Narayanappa S/o. Late Rangappa
Case History
-
04-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
24-Jan-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
19-Dec-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The court allowed the interim application (IA No.1) filed by appellant Sri. M. Kuppanna seeking condonation of a 394-day delay in filing an appeal against the dismissal of his partition suit (OS No.12/2012) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court held that the appellant, a 72-year-old senior citizen, had established sufficient grounds for condonation, particularly considering the substantial property rights at stake, and the case has been posted for arguments on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Dec-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
22-Nov-2025
First Hearing/Maintainability-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
25-Oct-2025
First Hearing/Maintainability-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
20-Sep-2025
First Hearing/Maintainability-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
30-Aug-2025
First Hearing/Maintainability-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
19-Jul-2025
First Hearing/Maintainability-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
20-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
20-Jun-2025
First Hearing/Maintainability-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
05-Apr-2025
Evidence-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
07-Mar-2025
First Hearing/Maintainability-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
31-Jan-2025
First Hearing/Maintainability-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
04-Jan-2025
First Hearing/Maintainability-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
29-Nov-2024
First Hearing/Maintainability-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
19-Oct-2024
First Hearing/Maintainability-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
31-Aug-2024
First Hearing/Maintainability-C
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
20-Jul-2024
For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
14-Jun-2024
For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
30-Mar-2024
For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
23-Feb-2024
For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hagaribommanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
19-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2024
Summary: The court allowed the interim application (IA No.1) filed by appellant Sri. M. Kuppanna seeking condonation of a 394-day delay in filing an appeal against the dismissal of his partition suit (OS No.12/2012) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court held that the appellant, a 72-year-old senior citizen, had established sufficient grounds for condonation, particularly considering the substantial property rights at stake, and the case has been posted for arguments on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts