Baduger /didda /veerappa age 70 years vs Smt. Kannamadagu Nagamma wife of Sharanappa age 35 years — 211/2016
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Read with Sec 26 of Cpc Section UO7RULE1AND2. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN300019162016
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
211/2016
Filing Date
27-09-2016
Registration No
211/2016
Registration Date
27-09-2016
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI
Judge
584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baduger /didda /veerappa age 70 years
Adv. sru C Basavaraj advocate
Respondent(s)
Smt. Kannamadagu Nagamma wife of Sharanappa age 35 years
P D O Grampanchayathi
The P D O Grampanchayathi Hansi village
Hearing History
Judge: 584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
HEARING
HEARING
FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR)
FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR)
FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 05-03-2026 | FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR) | |
| 24-02-2026 | FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR) | |
| 17-02-2026 | FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR) |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Civil Judge of Hagaribommanahalli dismissed the plaintiff's interim applications (I.A. No. XI and XII) seeking summons to issue public documents and mark xerox copies of 1981 proceedings as evidence. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish sufficient grounds under Karnataka Civil Rules of Practice Rule 80(2) and (3), as he did not specify which documents were needed, did not attempt to obtain certified copies, and did not explain why certified copies would be insufficient—all of which are mandatory requirements before summoning public documents from government authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Civil Judge of Hagaribommanahalli dismissed the plaintiff's interim applications (I.A. No. XI and XII) seeking summons to issue public documents and mark xerox copies of 1981 proceedings as evidence. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish sufficient grounds under Karnataka Civil Rules of Practice Rule 80(2) and (3), as he did not specify which documents were needed, did not attempt to obtain certified copies, and did not explain why certified copies would be insufficient—all of which are mandatory requirements before summoning public documents from government authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts