P Jayappa sonof late P Hanumavva age 63 years vs Sri H M Gurusiddaiah sonof Gavisiddaiah age 60 years — 190/2016
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Read with Sec 26 of Cpc Section uo7ru1nand2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN300015432016
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
190/2016
Filing Date
08-08-2016
Registration No
190/2016
Registration Date
08-08-2016
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI
Judge
584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P Jayappa sonof late P Hanumavva age 63 years
Adv. SANNAKOTI VISHALAKSHI HANUMANTHAPPA
Respondent(s)
Sri H M Gurusiddaiah sonof Gavisiddaiah age 60 years
The PDO Officer Kadlabalu
Hearing History
Judge: 584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Disposed
APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C
WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C | |
| 09-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C | |
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 05-03-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) |
Final Orders / Judgements
In O.S. No. 190/2016, the Megha Lok-Adalath permitted Plaintiff No. 6 to compromise the matter on behalf of minor Plaintiff No. 8 after approving the requisite application. Both parties filed and voluntarily signed a compromise petition containing legal terms, which the court found to be voluntary and lawful. The suit was decreed in accordance with the compromise petition's terms and conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In O.S. No. 190/2016, the Megha Lok-Adalath permitted Plaintiff No. 6 to compromise the matter on behalf of minor Plaintiff No. 8 after approving the requisite application. Both parties filed and voluntarily signed a compromise petition containing legal terms, which the court found to be voluntary and lawful. The suit was decreed in accordance with the compromise petition's terms and conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts