Smt Anchi sanna Durugavva wife of Mallappa vs Smt Tharihalli Kotramma wife of J Ningppa — 242/2014
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Read with Sec 26 of Cpc Section under7rule1and2. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN300012412014
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
242/2014
Filing Date
19-11-2014
Registration No
242/2014
Registration Date
19-11-2014
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI
Judge
584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt Anchi sanna Durugavva wife of Mallappa
Adv. SHRI ASHOK KANAKERI ADVOCATE
Respondent(s)
Smt Tharihalli Kotramma wife of J Ningppa
Hearing History
Judge: 584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
HEARING
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 28-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 28-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The defendant's Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. VIII) under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC to implead 8 proposed defendants (the defendant's children and relatives as defendants No. 2-9) was dismissed on January 8, 2026. The court held that the plaintiff, as dominus litis (master of the suit), cannot be compelled to implead additional defendants against their wishes in a property title and permanent injunction case, citing Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The defendant's Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. VIII) under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC to implead 8 proposed defendants (the defendant's children and relatives as defendants No. 2-9) was dismissed on January 8, 2026. The court held that the plaintiff, as dominus litis (master of the suit), cannot be compelled to implead additional defendants against their wishes in a property title and permanent injunction case, citing Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts