Smt. K Shakunthalamma wife of Umesha G Do Kotlamma vs Smt. K Yakamma wife ofBhemmanna Nayakar Do Kotlamma — 189/2015
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Read with Sec 26 of Cpc Section uo7rule1nd2cpc. Status: SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR). Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN300012022015
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
189/2015
Filing Date
15-09-2015
Registration No
189/2015
Registration Date
15-09-2015
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI
Judge
584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. K Shakunthalamma wife of Umesha G Do Kotlamma
Adv. Sri Kotresh sheeter advocate
Respondent(s)
Smt. K Yakamma wife ofBhemmanna Nayakar Do Kotlamma
Smt K Saroja wife of Vijaya kumar Do Kotlamma(Legal Heir)
Smt. K Venkatesh son of Kotelamma
Hearing History
Judge: 584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 18-03-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 02-03-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 30-01-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) |
Interim Orders
This court order in Kannada (Case No. 189-2015, dated 13-02-2019) dismisses the petition. The court held that all issues raised by the petitioner are maintainable and valid, and modified certain provisions from Sections 7 to 9. The court directed the appropriate authority to reconsider the matter in accordance with the judgment and comply as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This court order in Kannada (Case No. 189-2015, dated 13-02-2019) dismisses the petition. The court held that all issues raised by the petitioner are maintainable and valid, and modified certain provisions from Sections 7 to 9. The court directed the appropriate authority to reconsider the matter in accordance with the judgment and comply as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts