P.Jayappa Son of Late P. Hanumavva vs Kogali Rudramma Wife of Kogali Sanna Kotragouda — 115/2018
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Read with Sec 26 of Cpc Section .. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN300008092018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
115/2018
Filing Date
19-07-2018
Registration No
115/2018
Registration Date
19-07-2018
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI
Judge
584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Jayappa Son of Late P. Hanumavva
Adv. S.H.Vishalakshi
Respondent(s)
Kogali Rudramma Wife of Kogali Sanna Kotragouda
The Panchayath Development Officer,
Hearing History
Judge: 584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Disposed
APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C
WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C | |
| 09-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C | |
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 05-03-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: In O.S.No.115/2018 before Megha Lok-Adalath, the court allowed the compromise petition filed by both parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC. The court permitted Plaintiff No.6 to compromise the matter on behalf of minor Plaintiff No.8, finding the compromise agreement to be legal and voluntary. The suit was decreed in accordance with the terms and conditions agreed upon in the compromise petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S.No.115/2018 before Megha Lok-Adalath, the court allowed the compromise petition filed by both parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC. The court permitted Plaintiff No.6 to compromise the matter on behalf of minor Plaintiff No.8, finding the compromise agreement to be legal and voluntary. The suit was decreed in accordance with the terms and conditions agreed upon in the compromise petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts