Meti Chinnamma wife of late Meti Parasuramappa age 50 years House hold Ro Basarakodu village h b h vs Taluru Naarathna wife of Taluru shivprakashgouda age 48 years Co Z P Offcice Harpanhalli. — 70/2015
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Read with Sec 26 of Cpc Section uo7rule1and2. Status: EVIDENCE-C. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN300004212015
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
70/2015
Filing Date
08-04-2015
Registration No
70/2015
Registration Date
08-04-2015
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI
Judge
584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Meti Chinnamma wife of late Meti Parasuramappa age 50 years House hold Ro Basarakodu village h b h
Adv. smt. S H Vishalakshi Advocate
Respondent(s)
Taluru Naarathna wife of Taluru shivprakashgouda age 48 years Co Z P Offcice Harpanhalli.
Hearing History
Judge: 584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 13-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 10-02-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed interim applications I.A. No. VII and VIII filed by the defendant to recall Defense Witness 1 (DW1) for further examination-in-chief, imposing costs of Rs. 500. The court found the defendant had made out proper grounds given that her previous examination of DW1 was marked as NIL due to illness, and she must be given the opportunity to prove her defense regarding the suit property. The case is adjourned to 25.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed interim applications I.A. No. VII and VIII filed by the defendant to recall Defense Witness 1 (DW1) for further examination-in-chief, imposing costs of Rs. 500. The court found the defendant had made out proper grounds given that her previous examination of DW1 was marked as NIL due to illness, and she must be given the opportunity to prove her defense regarding the suit property. The case is adjourned to 25.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts