Kurubara Mariyappa @ Chilagodu Kurubar Mariyappa son of Late K Hanumanthappa vs Mainalli Neelama wife of Late Balappa — 36/2015
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Read with Sec 26 of Cpc Section uorule7rule1and2. Status: EVIDENCE-C. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN300002252015
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
36/2015
Filing Date
21-02-2015
Registration No
36/2015
Registration Date
21-02-2015
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI
Judge
584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kurubara Mariyappa @ Chilagodu Kurubar Mariyappa son of Late K Hanumanthappa
Adv. Sri C Basappa
Smt Gubbamma wife of latge kurubara sanna bailappa
Chilagodu kurubara Hanumanthappa
Respondent(s)
Mainalli Neelama wife of Late Balappa
Hovina Lakshmavva wife of Hanumanthppa(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 584-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 18-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 03-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 24-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
Interim Orders
Outcome Summary: The Civil Judge & JMFC at Hagaribommanahalli allowed I.A. No. IX, permitting the plaintiffs to amend their plaint by adding property boundaries to the schedule. The court found that the amendment was necessary for proper adjudication, did not introduce new facts, and would not prejudice the defendants who retain the opportunity to file an additional written statement. The application was allowed with a cost of Rs. 500/-. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Outcome Summary: The Civil Judge & JMFC at Hagaribommanahalli allowed I.A. No. IX, permitting the plaintiffs to amend their plaint by adding property boundaries to the schedule. The court found that the amendment was necessary for proper adjudication, did not introduce new facts, and would not prejudice the defendants who retain the opportunity to file an additional written statement. The application was allowed with a cost of Rs. 500/-. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts