Smt. Basamma 2nd W/o Late. Hunasemarada Hattappa vs Smt. Bhagyamma W/o Late. Purushothama — 10/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,rule 4 R/w 151. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 08-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Misc - Miscellaneous Cases

CNR: KAVN210033462023

Filing Number

10/2023

Filing Date

25-Nov-2023

Registration No

10/2023

Registration Date

25-Nov-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUDLIGI

Judge

583-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,rule 4 R/w 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Basamma 2nd W/o Late. Hunasemarada Hattappa

    Adv. H.B.Sharanagouda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Bhagyamma W/o Late. Purushothama

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary In Civil Misc No. 10/2023, the court petition filed by Basamma was dismissed on 02-02-2026. The court found no sufficient grounds to interfere with the original cases (Civil Cases 57/2019 and 22/2022) and ruled that the petitioner had not demonstrated valid reasons for reconsideration. The court noted that the original case was already disposed of three days prior to this petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  9. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  11. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  12. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  13. 07-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  15. 15-Jan-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  16. 10-Jan-2025

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  17. 04-Jan-2025

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  18. 02-Dec-2024

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  19. 30-Sep-2024

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  20. 22-Jul-2024

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  21. 15-Jun-2024

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  22. 16-Mar-2024

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  23. 17-Feb-2024

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  24. 08-Jan-2024

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  25. 25-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 25-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Civil Misc No. 10/2023, the court petition filed by Basamma was dismissed on 02-02-2026. The court found no sufficient grounds to interfere with the original cases (Civil Cases 57/2019 and 22/2022) and ruled that the petitioner had not demonstrated valid reasons for reconsideration. The court noted that the original case was already disposed of three days prior to this petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case