Smt K Papamma vs Smt Boramma — 122/2015

Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Read with Sec 151 of Cpc Section CPC. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 28th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAVN210009412015

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

123/2015

Filing Date

10-07-2015

Registration No

122/2015

Registration Date

10-07-2015

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUDLIGI

Judge

583-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUDLIGI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

Decision Date

28th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 read with sec 151 of CPC Section CPC

Petitioner(s)

Smt K Papamma

Adv. M.NAGARAJA

Respondent(s)

Smt Boramma

Hearing History

Judge: 583-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUDLIGI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

28-03-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER

18-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

27-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

28-03-2026
Judgment

Court Summary The Civil Judge at Kudligi dismissed the plaintiff's suit for declaration and permanent injunction regarding property Sy.no.313/2 (9.50 acres). The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove ownership of the property, noting that the original 1959 grant was issued to "Boramma" without clear identification, and the plaintiff's unregistered 1998 relinquishment deed cannot transfer valid title under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

19-03-2016

Issue

18-07-2019
Deposition
18-07-2019
Deposition
04-08-2023
Deposition
06-08-2025
Deposition
21-08-2025
Deposition
21-08-2025
Deposition
04-09-2025
Deposition
12-12-2025
Deposition
13-01-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Civil Judge at Kudligi dismissed the plaintiff's suit for declaration and permanent injunction regarding property Sy.no.313/2 (9.50 acres). The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove ownership of the property, noting that the original 1959 grant was issued to "Boramma" without clear identification, and the plaintiff's unregistered 1998 relinquishment deed cannot transfer valid title under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUDLIGI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case