SMT GANGAMMA vs SMT KOTRAMMA — 12/2011
Case under Under Sec Section UNDERORDER20RULE18ANDORDER26RULE13READWITHSEC151OFCPC. Status: APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KAVN210002792011
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
23-11-2011
Registration No
12/2011
Registration Date
23-11-2011
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUDLIGI
Judge
583-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUDLIGI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT GANGAMMA
Adv. T KOTRESH
Respondent(s)
SMT KOTRAMMA
Hearing History
Judge: 583-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUDLIGI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C
APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C
APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C
APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C
APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C | |
| 16-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C | |
| 12-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C | |
| 07-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C | |
| 05-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected an application (I.A. No. XXII) filed by respondents 12(a)-(h) seeking to incorporate additional joint family properties into the final decree by amendment. The judge found that determining whether the properties are joint family assets requires a full trial and cannot be resolved in the current final decree proceedings. The applicants were directed to pursue their claims in the pending separate suit (O.S. No. 44/2022) and each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected an application (I.A. No. XXII) filed by respondents 12(a)-(h) seeking to incorporate additional joint family properties into the final decree by amendment. The judge found that determining whether the properties are joint family assets requires a full trial and cannot be resolved in the current final decree proceedings. The applicants were directed to pursue their claims in the pending separate suit (O.S. No. 44/2022) and each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts