M. Maralusiddappa S/o Late. Mallal Sidramappa vs Basavaraja S/o Kalyanappa — 29/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,rul,e 1 and, 2 R/,w 151. Status: ISSUES-C. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN210002432025
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
29/2025
Filing Date
28-01-2025
Registration No
29/2025
Registration Date
28-01-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUDLIGI
Judge
583-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUDLIGI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M. Maralusiddappa S/o Late. Mallal Sidramappa
Adv. D.Karibasavaraja
Smt. Eramma W/o Late. Devendrappa
M. Chandrashekhara S/o Late. Mallal Sidramappa
S. Umakanth S/o Late. Mallal Sidramappa
Respondent(s)
Basavaraja S/o Kalyanappa
Siddaramesha S/o Kalyanappa
Gunnalli Prabhu S/o Kalyanappa
K. Veeranna S/o Late. Kaptral Basappa
K. Pampanna S/o Late. Kaptral Basappa
K. Shanmukhappa S/o Late. Kaptral Basappa
K. Halappa S/o Jambanna
Mallikarjuna S/o Pampapathi
Kotresh S/o Vishwanathappa
Siddaremshi S/o Vishwanathappa
Hearing History
Judge: 583-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUDLIGI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
ISSUES-C
ISSUES-C
ISSUES-C
ISSUES-C
FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ISSUES-C |
| 12-02-2026 | ISSUES-C |
| 31-10-2025 | ISSUES-C |
| 19-09-2025 | ISSUES-C |
| 22-08-2025 | FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Court of Civil Judge & JMFC, Kudligi rejected the plaintiffs' application for interim temporary injunction (I.A. No.I) under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case because the identity of the suit schedule property itself is disputed—specifically regarding boundary demarcation with the adjoining property (Sy.no.589)—and there was insufficient prima facie material demonstrating that defendants were attempting encroachment. Consequently, questions of balance of convenience and irreparable loss did not arise, warranting rejection of the injunction application with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Court of Civil Judge & JMFC, Kudligi rejected the plaintiffs' application for interim temporary injunction (I.A. No.I) under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case because the identity of the suit schedule property itself is disputed—specifically regarding boundary demarcation with the adjoining property (Sy.no.589)—and there was insufficient prima facie material demonstrating that defendants were attempting encroachment. Consequently, questions of balance of convenience and irreparable loss did not arise, warranting rejection of the injunction application with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts