M. Maralusiddappa S/o Late. Mallal Sidramappa vs Basavaraja S/o Kalyanappa — 29/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,rul,e 1 and, 2 R/,w 151. Status: ISSUES-C. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAVN210002432025

ISSUES-C

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

Filing Number

29/2025

Filing Date

28-01-2025

Registration No

29/2025

Registration Date

28-01-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUDLIGI

Judge

583-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUDLIGI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,rul,e 1 and, 2 R/,w 151

Petitioner(s)

M. Maralusiddappa S/o Late. Mallal Sidramappa

Adv. D.Karibasavaraja

Smt. Eramma W/o Late. Devendrappa

M. Chandrashekhara S/o Late. Mallal Sidramappa

S. Umakanth S/o Late. Mallal Sidramappa

Respondent(s)

Basavaraja S/o Kalyanappa

Siddaramesha S/o Kalyanappa

Gunnalli Prabhu S/o Kalyanappa

K. Veeranna S/o Late. Kaptral Basappa

K. Pampanna S/o Late. Kaptral Basappa

K. Shanmukhappa S/o Late. Kaptral Basappa

K. Halappa S/o Jambanna

Mallikarjuna S/o Pampapathi

Kotresh S/o Vishwanathappa

Siddaremshi S/o Vishwanathappa

Hearing History

Judge: 583-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUDLIGI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

06-03-2026

ISSUES-C

12-02-2026

ISSUES-C

31-10-2025

ISSUES-C

19-09-2025

ISSUES-C

22-08-2025

FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C

Interim Orders

22-08-2025
Orders

Summary: The Court of Civil Judge & JMFC, Kudligi rejected the plaintiffs' application for interim temporary injunction (I.A. No.I) under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case because the identity of the suit schedule property itself is disputed—specifically regarding boundary demarcation with the adjoining property (Sy.no.589)—and there was insufficient prima facie material demonstrating that defendants were attempting encroachment. Consequently, questions of balance of convenience and irreparable loss did not arise, warranting rejection of the injunction application with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court of Civil Judge & JMFC, Kudligi rejected the plaintiffs' application for interim temporary injunction (I.A. No.I) under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case because the identity of the suit schedule property itself is disputed—specifically regarding boundary demarcation with the adjoining property (Sy.no.589)—and there was insufficient prima facie material demonstrating that defendants were attempting encroachment. Consequently, questions of balance of convenience and irreparable loss did not arise, warranting rejection of the injunction application with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUDLIGI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case