C Raju S/o Late. Hanumanthappa vs Smt. Kariyamma W/o Late. Chalavadi Hanumanthappa — 16/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section XLIII,Rule,1,R/W/S.151. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals

CNR: KAVN200012902025

Filing Number

16/2025

Filing Date

28-Jul-2025

Registration No

16/2025

Registration Date

28-Jul-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUDLIGI

Judge

174-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section XLIII,Rule,1,R/W/S.151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C Raju S/o Late. Hanumanthappa

    Adv. A.VIJAYAKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Kariyamma W/o Late. Chalavadi Hanumanthappa

  2. 2.Anjinappa S/o Late. Chalavadihanumanthappa

  3. 3.Erappa S/o Late. Chalavadi Hanumanthappa

  4. 4.Nagaraja S/o Late. Chalavadi Hanumanthappa

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary The court dismissed the defendant's appeal and confirmed the trial court's order granting a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case of ownership based on government grant certificates, revenue records, and continuous possession since 1959, while the defendant produced no documentary evidence of ownership. The balance of convenience favored the plaintiffs, as vacating the injunction would cause them greater hardship than maintaining it would cause the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  9. 31-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  10. 17-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  11. 25-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  12. 11-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  13. 28-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 28-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the defendant's appeal and confirmed the trial court's order granting a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case of ownership based on government grant certificates, revenue records, and continuous possession since 1959, while the defendant produced no documentary evidence of ownership. The balance of convenience favored the plaintiffs, as vacating the injunction would cause them greater hardship than maintaining it would cause the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case