G R Manjunatha S/o Late Shivalingappa vs G R Veeranna S/o Late Shivalingappa — 108/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,2. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 06th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN200006812025
Filing Number
117/2025
Filing Date
03-06-2025
Registration No
108/2025
Registration Date
03-06-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUDLIGI
Judge
174-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUDLIGI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G R Manjunatha S/o Late Shivalingappa
Adv. M Nagaraja
G R Parvatamma W/o Late Shidramesha
G R Prakash S/o Late Shidramesha
G R Shantha W/o Girish D/o Late Shidramesha
Respondent(s)
G R Veeranna S/o Late Shivalingappa
G R Basamma W/o Late Somanna
G R Sidramesha S/o Late Gurusidappa
G R Chandrappa S/o Late Gurusiddappa
G R Veeranna S/o Late Gurusiddappa
G R Sharanappa S/o Late Gurusidappa
G R Kotresha S/o Late Gurusidappa
G R Shanmukha S/o Late Gurusidappa
Hearing History
Judge: 174-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUDLIGI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Disposed
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 05-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 09-10-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 04-09-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Kudligi dismissed the plaintiff's suit for default. The court found that despite the case being posted for plaintiff evidence since 09.10.2025 with sufficient opportunities provided, the plaintiff failed to appear and proceed with the case, demonstrating lack of interest. The plaintiff's prayer for time to adduce evidence was accordingly rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Kudligi dismissed the plaintiff's suit for default. The court found that despite the case being posted for plaintiff evidence since 09.10.2025 with sufficient opportunities provided, the plaintiff failed to appear and proceed with the case, demonstrating lack of interest. The plaintiff's prayer for time to adduce evidence was accordingly rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts