The P.S.I, Kottur P.S. vs A1-Vasanta S/o Late. Shivanna — 45/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section 115(2),118(1),189(3),190,191(2)351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAVN200001622025

Filing Number

45/2025

Filing Date

14-Feb-2025

Registration No

45/2025

Registration Date

14-Feb-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUDLIGI

Judge

174-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

184

Police Station

KOTTURU PS

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section 115(2),118(1),189(3),190,191(2)351(2),352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The P.S.I, Kottur P.S.

    Adv. Shilpa Y

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A1-Vasanta S/o Late. Shivanna

  2. 2.A-2 Jayama W/o Late. Shivanna

  3. 3.A-3 Anjinappa S/o Hanumanthapppa

  4. 4.A-4 Nagaraja S/o Ucchengeppa

  5. 5.A-5 Gangappa H.G S/o Hanuantappa

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case 45/2025 Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted all five accused persons of all charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's sole witness was the complainant Dilip Raj Patel, who testified but contradicted the prosecution's case during cross-examination. He denied lodging the complaint, denied the mahazar was conducted in his presence, and denied providing signatures on the documents. Since the alleged victim himself did not support the prosecution's allegations of assault, rioting, and criminal intimidation occurring on October 20, 2024, the court found no credible evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and deemed it unnecessary to call remaining witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgment/Final Order

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence On Prosecution/Petitioner(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Hearing Before Charge(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Hearing Before Charge(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Hearing Before Charge(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  11. 04-Aug-2025

    Hearing Before Charge(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  12. 22-Jul-2025

    Hearing Before Charge(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  13. 21-Jul-2025

    Appearance Of Accused(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  14. 28-Apr-2025

    Appearance Of Accused(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kudligi Vijayanagara District

  15. 14-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 14-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 45/2025 Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted all five accused persons of all charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's sole witness was the complainant Dilip Raj Patel, who testified but contradicted the prosecution's case during cross-examination. He denied lodging the complaint, denied the mahazar was conducted in his presence, and denied providing signatures on the documents. Since the alleged victim himself did not support the prosecution's allegations of assault, rioting, and criminal intimidation occurring on October 20, 2024, the court found no credible evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and deemed it unnecessary to call remaining witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case