Traffic PS, Hosapete vs Durugesh S/o Govindappa — 1132/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304(A),. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAVN050016692023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1132/2023
Filing Date
07-11-2023
Registration No
1132/2023
Registration Date
07-11-2023
Court
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE
Judge
171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
HOSAPETE TRAFFIC PS
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Traffic PS (Police Station), Hosapete
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Durugesh S/o Govindappa
Rama Rao. K S/o Subba Rao. K
Ajay Reddy S/o Venkata Reddy
Hearing History
Judge: 171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Disposed
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-03-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 28-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 13-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 05-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted Accused No. 2 (car driver Rama Rao K.) of charges under Sections 279, 337, and 304A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 183 of the Motor Vehicles Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he caused the fatal motorcycle accident through rash or negligent driving. The court found significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding whether a dog caused him to brake suddenly, and determined the motorcycle rider's own speedy driving without maintaining safe distance was the primary cause of the collision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted Accused No. 2 (car driver Rama Rao K.) of charges under Sections 279, 337, and 304A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 183 of the Motor Vehicles Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he caused the fatal motorcycle accident through rash or negligent driving. The court found significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding whether a dog caused him to brake suddenly, and determined the motorcycle rider's own speedy driving without maintaining safe distance was the primary cause of the collision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts