Kumaraswamy.L., S/o L. Ramappa vs Ramesh Guli S/o Bharmappa Guli — 1056/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/s,200,of,CRPC,R/W,Sec,138,of,NIAct. Status: EVIDENCE-C. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAVN050015452023

EVIDENCE-C

Next Hearing

25th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1056/2023

Filing Date

19-10-2023

Registration No

1056/2023

Registration Date

19-10-2023

Court

ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE

Judge

171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section U/s,200,of,CRPC,R/W,Sec,138,of,NIAct

Petitioner(s)

Kumaraswamy.L., S/o L. Ramappa

Adv. B.C. Mahantesh

Respondent(s)

Ramesh Guli S/o Bharmappa Guli

Hearing History

Judge: 171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE

04-04-2026

EVIDENCE-C

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE-C

10-02-2026

EVIDENCE-C

23-01-2026

EVIDENCE-C

16-12-2025

EVIDENCE-C

Interim Orders

24-09-2024
Plea
21-06-2025
Deposition
16-12-2025
Deposition

This court order, written in Kannada, documents witness testimony in a civil case (C.C. No. 1056/23) heard on 16-12-2025. The witness testified about lending Rs. 4 lakhs to the accused (defendant) for his brother-in-law's wedding expenses, with a promise of repayment within 3 months, but without any written agreement or security. The witness also mentioned that the accused had misused another cheque in a related case (C.C. No. 2465/2022) and that the accused was declared a defaulter in that case. The court adjourned the matter for further arguments by the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This court order, written in Kannada, documents witness testimony in a civil case (C.C. No. 1056/23) heard on 16-12-2025. The witness testified about lending Rs. 4 lakhs to the accused (defendant) for his brother-in-law's wedding expenses, with a promise of repayment within 3 months, but without any written agreement or security. The witness also mentioned that the accused had misused another cheque in a related case (C.C. No. 2465/2022) and that the accused was declared a defaulter in that case. The court adjourned the matter for further arguments by the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case