S. Taheer S/o S./ Iqbal vs Mohammed Ayaz Khan S/o Late Mahboob Ali Khan — 439/2021
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/s,200,R/w,138,NI,Act. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAVN050007512021
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
439/2021
Filing Date
19-08-2021
Registration No
439/2021
Registration Date
19-08-2021
Court
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE
Judge
171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Taheer S/o S./ Iqbal
Adv. M. Neelakantaiah
Respondent(s)
Mohammed Ayaz Khan S/o Late Mahboob Ali Khan
Hearing History
Judge: 171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 26-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Civil Case No. 439/2021 before the Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Vijayanagar District, Hosapete, the court admitted a 2018 agreement document (marked as Ex.P7) into evidence despite the accused's objection that he was not a party to it. The court ruled that the accused's objection cannot be entertained at the marking stage as it is a ministerial act, and the document's merit and proof will be appreciated during trial. The accused's counsel was granted time for cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Civil Case No. 439/2021 before the Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Vijayanagar District, Hosapete, the court admitted a 2018 agreement document (marked as Ex.P7) into evidence despite the accused's objection that he was not a party to it. The court ruled that the accused's objection cannot be entertained at the marking stage as it is a ministerial act, and the document's merit and proof will be appreciated during trial. The accused's counsel was granted time for cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts