V. Deepavathi D/o K. Vijayan vs Sachin Kumar. K S/o Kanakaraj. M — 40/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125,. Status: EVIDENCE-C. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAVN050006762023
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
40/2023
Filing Date
17-06-2023
Registration No
40/2023
Registration Date
17-06-2023
Court
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE
Judge
171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V. Deepavathi D/o K. Vijayan
Adv. M.V Thavanshi
S. Vanshika D/o Sachin Kumar. K (Minor natural guardian her mother V. Deepavathi)
Respondent(s)
Sachin Kumar. K S/o Kanakaraj. M
Hearing History
Judge: 171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 29-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
Interim Orders
This document appears to be a Kannada language court order from Criminal Misc. Case No. 40/2023 involving a domestic dispute. A witness testified on 20-06-2025 regarding a matrimonial matter where the petitioner married the respondent (Accused No. 1) on 12.02.2015, and disputes arose regarding custody of their child and allegations of domestic cruelty filed in 2016. The court has recorded the witness examination and adjourned the case for further cross-examination of the petitioner's counsel, with proceedings to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document appears to be a Kannada language court order from Criminal Misc. Case No. 40/2023 involving a domestic dispute. A witness testified on 20-06-2025 regarding a matrimonial matter where the petitioner married the respondent (Accused No. 1) on 12.02.2015, and disputes arose regarding custody of their child and allegations of domestic cruelty filed in 2016. The court has recorded the witness examination and adjourned the case for further cross-examination of the petitioner's counsel, with proceedings to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts