Ranjeet Singh S/o Late Har Charn Singh vs Moula Hussain @ Moula Hussain Soudagar S/o Late Khaja Mainuddin — 252/2021
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/s,200,of,CRPC,R/W,Sec,138and142,of,NIAct. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAVN050005072021
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
252/2021
Filing Date
09-07-2021
Registration No
252/2021
Registration Date
09-07-2021
Court
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE
Judge
171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ranjeet Singh S/o Late Har Charn Singh
Adv. K Guru Prasad Rao
Respondent(s)
Moula Hussain @ Moula Hussain Soudagar S/o Late Khaja Mainuddin
Hearing History
Judge: 171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 03-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 28-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 13-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: C.C. 252/21 | Court: 1st Additional Civil Judge & District Court, Hosapete Outcome: The case proceeded with examination of witnesses on 24-11-2025. The court recorded the defendant's counsel's arguments and admitted various documentary evidence (notices, acknowledgments, summons, and petition documents). The court found no grounds for reconsideration and dismissed the defendant's party challenge, noting inconsistencies in the defendant's testimony regarding property purchase, loan acquisition, and submitted documents in relation to a separate case (C.C. 2170:2021). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: C.C. 252/21 | Court: 1st Additional Civil Judge & District Court, Hosapete Outcome: The case proceeded with examination of witnesses on 24-11-2025. The court recorded the defendant's counsel's arguments and admitted various documentary evidence (notices, acknowledgments, summons, and petition documents). The court found no grounds for reconsideration and dismissed the defendant's party challenge, noting inconsistencies in the defendant's testimony regarding property purchase, loan acquisition, and submitted documents in relation to a separate case (C.C. 2170:2021). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts