REHANA BASHA B W/O B.MEHAOOB BASHA vs T.HASEENA W/O T.AHAMED — 328/2018

Case under 138 Ni Act Section ACT. Status: JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAVN050005022018

JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER

Next Hearing

23rd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

328/2018

Filing Date

17-03-2018

Registration No

328/2018

Registration Date

17-03-2018

Court

ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE

Judge

171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE

Acts & Sections

138 NI Act Section ACT

Petitioner(s)

REHANA BASHA B W/O B.MEHAOOB BASHA

Adv. N. MANJUNATHA

Respondent(s)

T.HASEENA W/O T.AHAMED

Hearing History

Judge: 171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE

06-04-2026

JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER

02-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

24-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

12-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

17-06-2023
Plea
14-08-2023
Deposition
21-11-2023
Deposition
03-04-2024
Orders
29-06-2024
Deposition
24-07-2024
313 Statement
24-08-2024
Deposition
09-10-2024
Deposition
21-03-2025
Deposition
20-06-2025
Deposition
13-08-2025
Deposition
22-11-2025
Deposition
09-01-2026
Orders

Summary: The court allowed the complainant's application under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to summon the PNB bank manager to produce specimen signatures of the accused and provide evidence. The accused had admitted the cheque belonged to her but denied her signature during cross-examination, making the specimen signature evidence necessary for the inquiry. The court directed summons to be issued to the bank manager with a returnable date of 02.02.2026, with all expenses borne by the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the complainant's application under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to summon the PNB bank manager to produce specimen signatures of the accused and provide evidence. The accused had admitted the cheque belonged to her but denied her signature during cross-examination, making the specimen signature evidence necessary for the inquiry. The court directed summons to be issued to the bank manager with a returnable date of 02.02.2026, with all expenses borne by the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case