Navakarnataka Souharda Credit Co-Operative Ltd. Rpt by its Ningappa Yolabhavi S/o Gopurappa vs Mohammad Shafi Kagadgar S/o Khadarsaheb Kagadgar — 354/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/s,200,of,CRPC,R/W,Sec,138,and,142of,NIAct. Status: 313 STATEMENT/STATEMENT OF ACCUSED(CR). Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAVN050004572024
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
354/2024
Filing Date
13-03-2024
Registration No
354/2024
Registration Date
13-03-2024
Court
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE
Judge
171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Navakarnataka Souharda Credit Co-Operative Ltd. Rpt by its Ningappa Yolabhavi S/o Gopurappa
Adv. S. K. Subodh
Respondent(s)
Mohammad Shafi Kagadgar S/o Khadarsaheb Kagadgar
Hearing History
Judge: 171-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
313 STATEMENT/STATEMENT OF ACCUSED(CR)
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED(CR)
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED(CR)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | 313 STATEMENT/STATEMENT OF ACCUSED(CR) |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 14-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 04-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED(CR) |
| 29-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED(CR) |
Interim Orders
Summary Civil Case No. 354/24 - The court examined witness testimony on 06-03-2026 regarding a loan of Rs. 10 lakhs jointly given to three individuals on 18-01-2024 by an organization. The court found that the accused misused an NPI-1 check provided for loan disbursement and failed to produce evidence of loan repayment. The court determined that the accused is unable to repay the check amount and the case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Civil Case No. 354/24 - The court examined witness testimony on 06-03-2026 regarding a loan of Rs. 10 lakhs jointly given to three individuals on 18-01-2024 by an organization. The court found that the accused misused an NPI-1 check provided for loan disbursement and failed to produce evidence of loan repayment. The court determined that the accused is unable to repay the check amount and the case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts