State by the PSI Hosapete Town PS vs Talavar Manjunatha S/o Late Talavar Tayappa — 2190/2024

Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section U/s,32,34. Status: SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR). Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAVN040035022024

SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2190/2024

Filing Date

20-04-2024

Registration No

2190/2024

Registration Date

20-04-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE

Judge

170-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE

FIR Details

FIR Number

7

Police Station

HOSAPETE TOWN PS

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

KARNATAKA EXCISE ACT 1965 Section U/s,32,34

Petitioner(s)

State by the PSI Hosapete Town PS (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Talavar Manjunatha S/o Late Talavar Tayappa

Hearing History

Judge: 170-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE

07-03-2026

SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)

17-01-2026

SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)

04-12-2025

SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)

31-10-2025

EVIDENCE-C

11-09-2025

EVIDENCE-C

Interim Orders

11-09-2025
Deposition

Case Summary: CC 2190/2024 This is a criminal case heard before the Principal Civil Judge's Court in Hosapete. The witness Parshuram (32 years old, hotel worker) was examined on 11-09-2025 regarding an alleged liquor seizure on 21-01-2023. The witness testified that he did not know the contents of the seizure panchnama (Exhibit 1), was not present during any seizure, and denied recognizing the accused. The prosecution's cross-examination highlighted inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding his knowledge and presence at the seizure operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 2190/2024 This is a criminal case heard before the Principal Civil Judge's Court in Hosapete. The witness Parshuram (32 years old, hotel worker) was examined on 11-09-2025 regarding an alleged liquor seizure on 21-01-2023. The witness testified that he did not know the contents of the seizure panchnama (Exhibit 1), was not present during any seizure, and denied recognizing the accused. The prosecution's cross-examination highlighted inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding his knowledge and presence at the seizure operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case