K.Shanthi w/o Late G.Kannan vs K.Amudavalli at Amuda w/o Late G.Kannan — 10/2017

Case under Under Sec Section act. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.

P and SC - Probate and Succession Cases

CNR: KAVN040025522017

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

10/2017

Filing Date

26-08-2017

Registration No

10/2017

Registration Date

26-08-2017

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE

Judge

170-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Under Sec Section act

Petitioner(s)

K.Shanthi w/o Late G.Kannan

Adv. T MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY

K.Nandini

G.Kiran Kumar

Respondent(s)

K.Amudavalli at Amuda w/o Late G.Kannan

K.Sharanya

The Secretary, Tunga Bhadra Board, T.B. Dam Hosapete

The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Branch, Hosapete

The Executive Engineer, H.W. and HLC Division , Hosapete

The Sub Divisional Officer,Hosapete.

Hearing History

Judge: 170-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE

23-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER

07-03-2026

JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER

05-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

04-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Orders

Summary: The court dismissed the petitioners' petition for a succession certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, filed to claim the deceased employee Kannan's monetary death benefits. The court found that the petitioners claimed to be Kannan's second wife and children from that marriage, but the respondents (Kannan's first wife and legitimate daughter) categorically denied this relationship. Since the foundational claims of marriage validity and parentage were substantially disputed and required detailed evidence, the court held that such matters cannot be resolved in summary succession proceedings and directed the petitioners to file a regular civil suit for comprehensive adjudication of their status as legal heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

20-01-2025
Deposition
28-01-2025
Deposition
06-08-2025
Deposition
09-09-2025
Deposition
15-10-2025
Deposition
19-11-2025
Deposition
11-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed the petitioners' petition for a succession certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, filed to claim the deceased employee Kannan's monetary death benefits. The court found that the petitioners claimed to be Kannan's second wife and children from that marriage, but the respondents (Kannan's first wife and legitimate daughter) categorically denied this relationship. Since the foundational claims of marriage validity and parentage were substantially disputed and required detailed evidence, the court held that such matters cannot be resolved in summary succession proceedings and directed the petitioners to file a regular civil suit for comprehensive adjudication of their status as legal heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case