State by the PSI Town PS Hosapete vs Vishnu D Son of Late Raamu — 1866/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section 304. Status: Evidence-C. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Evidence-C Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAVN040025392025

Filing Number

1866/2025

Filing Date

07-Mar-2025

Registration No

1866/2025

Registration Date

07-Mar-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE

Judge

170-Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

197

Police Station

HOSAPETE TOWN PS

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section 304

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State by the PSI Town PS (Police Station) Hosapete

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vishnu D Son of Late Raamu

  2. 2.Raahul

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary This is a civil court order (CC 1866/2025) from Vijyanagar District, Karnataka, documenting witness examination in a case involving a panchnama (official inspection report) related to alleged gold theft. The witness Somappa (66 years old) testified on 18-03-2026 regarding his participation in the panchnama conducted approximately one year prior. During cross-examination by both accused's counsel, the witness admitted to having limited knowledge of case details and acknowledged signing documents without full understanding of their contents, raising questions about the reliability of the panchnama documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence-C

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence-C

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  8. 22-Nov-2025

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  9. 10-Oct-2025

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  10. 26-Sep-2025

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  11. 12-Sep-2025

    Hearing Before Charge(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  12. 04-Sep-2025

    Hearing Before Charge(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  13. 21-Jun-2025

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  14. 09-May-2025

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  15. 03-May-2025

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  16. 02-May-2025

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  17. 28-Apr-2025

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  18. 05-Apr-2025

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Principal CIVIL Judge And JMFC Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  19. 07-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 07-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1866/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil court order (CC 1866/2025) from Vijyanagar District, Karnataka, documenting witness examination in a case involving a panchnama (official inspection report) related to alleged gold theft. The witness Somappa (66 years old) testified on 18-03-2026 regarding his participation in the panchnama conducted approximately one year prior. During cross-examination by both accused's counsel, the witness admitted to having limited knowledge of case details and acknowledged signing documents without full understanding of their contents, raising questions about the reliability of the panchnama documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case