A1. Veerabhadra Swamy S/o B. M. Prakash vs The State by PSI Hosahalli P.S. — 161/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAVN010015962026

Filing Number

161/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

161/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA

Judge

1574-Prl. District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

HOSAHALLI PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section 115(2),351(2),352,85
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A1. Veerabhadra Swamy S/o B. M. Prakash

    Adv. S.Chandrappa

  2. 2.A2. B.M. Prakash S/o Late Siddalingaiah

  3. 3.A3. Manjula W/o B M. Prakash

  4. 4.A4. B M Prabhudeva S/o Late B. M. Siddalingaiah

  5. 5.A5. Savitha W/o B M Prabhudeva

  6. 6.A6. Manjunatha S/o Late Siddalingaiah

  7. 7.A7. Mangala alias Manjula W/o Manjunath

  8. 8.A8. Darshan b M s/o B. M. Prakash (Proposed Accused)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State by PSI Hosahalli P.S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to all eight accused in a dowry harassment case involving allegations of physical and mental cruelty, citing that the offences are non-capital, triable by Magistrate courts, and the accused are permanent residents with deep community roots. The court applied Supreme Court precedent from *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* emphasizing judicial caution against arrest in simple domestic matters, imposing conditions requiring Rs. 10,000 personal bonds per accused and mandating non-tampering with witnesses, cooperation with investigation, and court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgment/Final Order

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 161/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to all eight accused in a dowry harassment case involving allegations of physical and mental cruelty, citing that the offences are non-capital, triable by Magistrate courts, and the accused are permanent residents with deep community roots. The court applied Supreme Court precedent from *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* emphasizing judicial caution against arrest in simple domestic matters, imposing conditions requiring Rs. 10,000 personal bonds per accused and mandating non-tampering with witnesses, cooperation with investigation, and court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case