A1. Rangappa alias Ramappa Gejali s/o Balappa vs The State by PSI Kottur P.S. — 160/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAVN010015952026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
160/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
160/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA
Judge
1574-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
23
Police Station
KOTTURU PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A1. Rangappa alias Ramappa Gejali s/o Balappa
Adv. S.Chandrappa
A3. Santosha S/o Gopaa Krishna
A4. Rama alias Kavadi Rangappa s/o Kavadi Gangamma
A5. Abhi alias Abhishek S/o Rmachandrappa
Respondent(s)
The State by PSI Kottur P.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1574-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Disposed
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 07-03-2026 | FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR) |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge of Vijayanagara District rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by four accused persons (No.1, 3-5) charged under Section 318(4) of BNS, 2023 for a gold coin fraud scheme where they allegedly defrauded a complainant of ₹2 lakhs. The court found a prima facie case against the accused, noting the gravity of the offence, risk of witness tampering, likelihood of absconding, and incomplete investigation as reasons to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge of Vijayanagara District rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by four accused persons (No.1, 3-5) charged under Section 318(4) of BNS, 2023 for a gold coin fraud scheme where they allegedly defrauded a complainant of ₹2 lakhs. The court found a prima facie case against the accused, noting the gravity of the offence, risk of witness tampering, likelihood of absconding, and incomplete investigation as reasons to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts