Kadalamma alias Kadlamma W/o Nageshappa alias G. Nageshappa vs The Executive Engineer-KPTCL Ballari — 5216/2024

Case under Indian Telegraph Act Section 16(3). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.

Misc - Miscellaneous Cases

CNR: KAVN010015802024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

5216/2024

Filing Date

21-10-2024

Registration No

5216/2024

Registration Date

21-10-2024

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA

Judge

983-ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Indian Telegraph Act Section 16(3)

Petitioner(s)

Kadalamma alias Kadlamma W/o Nageshappa alias G. Nageshappa

Adv. C.K. Nagaraj

Respondent(s)

The Executive Engineer-KPTCL Ballari

Hearing History

Judge: 983-ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE

07-03-2026

Disposed

23-02-2026

JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER

19-01-2026

EVIDENCE-C

15-11-2025

WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C

16-08-2025

WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Judgment

Court Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge dismissed the petitioner's petition seeking Rs. 20 lakhs compensation for alleged damage caused by a 66 KV high-tension power line drawn across her land by Karnataka Power Transmission Company Limited. The court found the petition time-barred under Article 137 of the Limitation Act 1963, as the power line was commissioned on 01.01.1993 (31 years prior) but the petition was filed only in 2024, exceeding the three-year limitation period. Additionally, the petitioner failed to produce supporting documentary evidence for the claimed losses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

23-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge dismissed the petitioner's petition seeking Rs. 20 lakhs compensation for alleged damage caused by a 66 KV high-tension power line drawn across her land by Karnataka Power Transmission Company Limited. The court found the petition time-barred under Article 137 of the Limitation Act 1963, as the power line was commissioned on 01.01.1993 (31 years prior) but the petition was filed only in 2024, exceeding the three-year limitation period. Additionally, the petitioner failed to produce supporting documentary evidence for the claimed losses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case