Venkatesh.P alias P.Venkatesha S/o Pennobalappa alias late G.Pennobalappa vs R1.The Executive Engineer -KPTCL, Ballari — 5212/2024

Case under Indian Telegraph Act Section 16(3). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc - Miscellaneous Cases

CNR: KAVN010015762024

Filing Number

5212/2024

Filing Date

21-Oct-2024

Registration No

5212/2024

Registration Date

21-Oct-2024

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA

Judge

983-Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Telegraph Act Section 16(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Venkatesh.P alias P.Venkatesha S/o Pennobalappa alias late G.Pennobalappa

    Adv. C.K.Nagaraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R1.The Executive Engineer -KPTCL, Ballari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's compensation claim under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, primarily on grounds of limitation. The petitioner sought ₹15 lakhs for damages allegedly caused by a 66 KV power line drawn across his land in 1993, but the petition filed in 2024 was time-barred under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as it exceeded the three-year filing requirement. Additionally, the court found insufficient documentary evidence to support claims regarding crop loss, land value diminution, and health hazards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Judgment/Final Order

    Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence-C

    Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  8. 16-Aug-2025

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  9. 21-Jun-2025

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  10. 05-Apr-2025

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  11. 01-Feb-2025

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  12. 30-Nov-2024

    Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  13. 21-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 21-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5212/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's compensation claim under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, primarily on grounds of limitation. The petitioner sought ₹15 lakhs for damages allegedly caused by a 66 KV power line drawn across his land in 1993, but the petition filed in 2024 was time-barred under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as it exceeded the three-year filing requirement. Additionally, the court found insufficient documentary evidence to support claims regarding crop loss, land value diminution, and health hazards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case