Venkatesh.P alias P.Venkatesha S/o Pennobalappa alias late G.Pennobalappa vs R1.The Executive Engineer -KPTCL, Ballari — 5212/2024
Case under Indian Telegraph Act Section 16(3). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAVN010015762024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5212/2024
Filing Date
21-10-2024
Registration No
5212/2024
Registration Date
21-10-2024
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA
Judge
983-ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Venkatesh.P alias P.Venkatesha S/o Pennobalappa alias late G.Pennobalappa
Adv. C.K.Nagaraj
Respondent(s)
R1.The Executive Engineer -KPTCL, Ballari
Hearing History
Judge: 983-ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Disposed
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
EVIDENCE-C
WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C
WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 15-11-2025 | WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C | |
| 16-08-2025 | WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's compensation claim under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, primarily on grounds of limitation. The petitioner sought ₹15 lakhs for damages allegedly caused by a 66 KV power line drawn across his land in 1993, but the petition filed in 2024 was time-barred under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as it exceeded the three-year filing requirement. Additionally, the court found insufficient documentary evidence to support claims regarding crop loss, land value diminution, and health hazards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's compensation claim under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, primarily on grounds of limitation. The petitioner sought ₹15 lakhs for damages allegedly caused by a 66 KV power line drawn across his land in 1993, but the petition filed in 2024 was time-barred under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as it exceeded the three-year filing requirement. Additionally, the court found insufficient documentary evidence to support claims regarding crop loss, land value diminution, and health hazards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts