Yashodamma W/o Lakshmappa alias late K.Lakshmappa vs R1.The Executive Engineer -KPTCL, Ballari — 5204/2024
Case under Indian Telegraph Act Section 16(3). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAVN010015032024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5204/2024
Filing Date
01-10-2024
Registration No
5204/2024
Registration Date
01-10-2024
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA
Judge
983-ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yashodamma W/o Lakshmappa alias late K.Lakshmappa
Adv. C.K.Nagaraj
Respondent(s)
R1.The Executive Engineer -KPTCL, Ballari
Hearing History
Judge: 983-ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Disposed
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
EVIDENCE-C
WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C
WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 15-11-2025 | WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C | |
| 16-08-2025 | WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional District & Sessions Judge dismissed the petitioner's petition seeking Rs. 10 lakh compensation for damages caused by a 66 KV power transmission line drawn across her land by Karnataka Power Transmission Company Limited. The court found the petition time-barred under Article 137 of the Limitation Act 1963, as the power line was commissioned in 1993 but the petition was filed in 2024—31 years later, far exceeding the three-year limitation period. Additionally, the petitioner failed to produce supporting documentary evidence for her claims of crop loss, tree loss, land devaluation, and borewell damage during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional District & Sessions Judge dismissed the petitioner's petition seeking Rs. 10 lakh compensation for damages caused by a 66 KV power transmission line drawn across her land by Karnataka Power Transmission Company Limited. The court found the petition time-barred under Article 137 of the Limitation Act 1963, as the power line was commissioned in 1993 but the petition was filed in 2024—31 years later, far exceeding the three-year limitation period. Additionally, the petitioner failed to produce supporting documentary evidence for her claims of crop loss, tree loss, land devaluation, and borewell damage during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts