H. Sondooraswamy S/o Ningappa vs The Executive Engineer -KPTCL, Ballari — 5202/2024
Case under Indian Telegraph Act Section 16(3). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAVN010015002024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5202/2024
Filing Date
01-10-2024
Registration No
5202/2024
Registration Date
01-10-2024
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA
Judge
983-ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
H. Sondooraswamy S/o Ningappa
Adv. C.K. Nagaraj
Respondent(s)
The Executive Engineer -KPTCL, Ballari
Hearing History
Judge: 983-ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Disposed
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
EVIDENCE-C
WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C
WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 15-11-2025 | WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C | |
| 16-08-2025 | WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petitioner's compensation claim under Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, finding the petition time-barred. The power transmission line was drawn on the petitioner's land in 1993, but the petition was filed in 2024—31 years later, exceeding the 3-year limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Additionally, the court found the petitioner failed to produce sufficient documentary evidence supporting his claimed damages of Rs. 16 lakh for crop loss, land value diminution, and tower erection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court dismissed the petitioner's compensation claim under Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, finding the petition time-barred. The power transmission line was drawn on the petitioner's land in 1993, but the petition was filed in 2024—31 years later, exceeding the 3-year limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Additionally, the court found the petitioner failed to produce sufficient documentary evidence supporting his claimed damages of Rs. 16 lakh for crop loss, land value diminution, and tower erection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts