A1. Subhash alias Gllarahalli Subhash S/o Gollarahalli Prabhugowda vs The State by PSI Ittigi P.S. — 140/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAVN010013792026

Filing Number

140/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

140/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA

Judge

983-Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules Section 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(v-a),3(1)(w)(i)
Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section 118(2),115(2),190,74,352,126(2),351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A1. Subhash alias Gllarahalli Subhash S/o Gollarahalli Prabhugowda

    Adv. ANGADI MANJUNATH

  2. 2.A2. K. Chandrashekar s/o K. Panchakshari Gouda

  3. 3.A3. Virupannavara Prakash alias Prakash s/o Veerupaksha Gowda

  4. 4.A4. Kotresh alias Gollarahalli Kotresha S/o Gollarahalli Prabhu Gowda

  5. 5.A5. Barikara Kotresha alias B.M. Kotresha S/o B M. Gangamma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State by PSI Ittigi P.S.

  2. 2.Bagali Jagadish s/o Late Ningappa

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge of Vijayanagara District rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by five accused persons charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 and various BNS sections. The court held that Section 18 of the 1989 Act bars the district court's jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail in such cases, and only the High Court can consider such applications under its inherent powers, citing a recent Supreme Court judgment establishing this jurisdictional limit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgment/Final Order

    Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 140/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge of Vijayanagara District rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by five accused persons charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 and various BNS sections. The court held that Section 18 of the 1989 Act bars the district court's jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail in such cases, and only the High Court can consider such applications under its inherent powers, citing a recent Supreme Court judgment establishing this jurisdictional limit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case