P.H. Ganesha S/o P.H. Anjineppa vs The State by S.H.O Kottur P.S. — 137/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAVN010013762026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
137/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
137/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA
Judge
1574-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
28
Police Station
KOTTURU PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.H. Ganesha S/o P.H. Anjineppa
Adv. Yogananda.M
Respondent(s)
The State by S.H.O Kottur P.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1574-PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Disposed
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR)
FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-03-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 27-02-2026 | FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR) | |
| 23-02-2026 | FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR) |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge of Vijayanagara District granted regular bail to the accused P.H. Ganesha in a case involving charges under BNS sections 351(2) and 69. The court found that while the complainant and accused had a 13-year consensual relationship culminating in a temple marriage, the 6-year delay in filing the FIR and the consensual nature of their sexual relations suggested the case involved miscommunication rather than criminal conduct. The court released the accused on Rs. 50,000 bail with conditions requiring non-tampering of witnesses and cooperation in investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge of Vijayanagara District granted regular bail to the accused P.H. Ganesha in a case involving charges under BNS sections 351(2) and 69. The court found that while the complainant and accused had a 13-year consensual relationship culminating in a temple marriage, the 6-year delay in filing the FIR and the consensual nature of their sexual relations suggested the case involved miscommunication rather than criminal conduct. The court released the accused on Rs. 50,000 bail with conditions requiring non-tampering of witnesses and cooperation in investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts