Mallikarjuna R.B alias R.B.Mallikarjuna S/o Katteppa alias late R.B.Katteppa vs R1.The Executive Engineer -KPTCL, Ballari — 5196/2024
Case under Indian Telegraph Act Section 16(3). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAVN010012912024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5196/2024
Filing Date
03-09-2024
Registration No
5196/2024
Registration Date
03-09-2024
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA
Judge
983-ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mallikarjuna R.B alias R.B.Mallikarjuna S/o Katteppa alias late R.B.Katteppa
Adv. C.K.Nagaraj
Respondent(s)
R1.The Executive Engineer -KPTCL, Ballari
Hearing History
Judge: 983-ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Disposed
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
EVIDENCE-C
WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C
WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 15-11-2025 | WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C | |
| 16-08-2025 | WRITTEN STATEMENTS/OBJECTION TO MAIN PETITION-C |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge of Vijayanagara District dismissed the petitioner's compensation claim under Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. The petitioner sought Rs. 7,00,000 for land value diminution and crop loss caused by a 66 KV power line drawn across his property, but the court found his claims lacked documentary evidence and held he had already received Rs. 55,013 in tower compensation, making him not entitled to further relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge of Vijayanagara District dismissed the petitioner's compensation claim under Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. The petitioner sought Rs. 7,00,000 for land value diminution and crop loss caused by a 66 KV power line drawn across his property, but the court found his claims lacked documentary evidence and held he had already received Rs. 55,013 in tower compensation, making him not entitled to further relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts