K. Vijayakumar S/o Mangala Huligemma vs The State by M.M. Halli P.S. — 132/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAVN010012082026
Filing Number
132/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
132/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA
Judge
983-Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K. Vijayakumar S/o Mangala Huligemma
Adv. S.Chandrappa
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State by M.M. Halli P.S.
-
2.K. Renuka w/o Vijayakumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by K. Vijayakumar under Section 482 of BNSS, relying on Supreme Court precedent establishing that district courts lack jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail in SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act cases—only the High Court can consider such pleas under Section 482 CrPC. The court held that Section 18 of the 1989 Act bars the district court's jurisdiction and that claims of malicious prosecution must be addressed by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgment/Final Order
Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete
-
03-Mar-2026
Arguments
Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete
-
26-Feb-2026
For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)
Addl District And Sessions Judge Vijayanagara District Hosapete
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 132/2026
Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by K. Vijayakumar under Section 482 of BNSS, relying on Supreme Court precedent establishing that district courts lack jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail in SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act cases—only the High Court can consider such pleas under Section 482 CrPC. The court held that Section 18 of the 1989 Act bars the district court's jurisdiction and that claims of malicious prosecution must be addressed by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts