Kumar Alias Korachara Kumar S/o Kenchappa vs State by the P.S.I. Ittigi P.S. Harapanahalli Taluk — 5059/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 382,. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KAVN010008082025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5059/2025
Filing Date
08-07-2025
Registration No
5059/2025
Registration Date
08-07-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VIJAYANAGARA
Judge
983-ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
41
Police Station
ITAGI PS
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kumar Alias Korachara Kumar S/o Kenchappa
Adv. R. Pandu
Respondent(s)
State by the P.S.I. Ittigi P.S. Harapanahalli Taluk
Hearing History
Judge: 983-ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT HOSAPETE
Disposed
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 23-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 03-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 13-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge affirmed the trial court's conviction of Kumar under Section 420 IPC (cheating) for defrauding two complainants of Rs. 80,000 by selling them fake gold coins, rejecting the appellant's claim for acquittal based on parity with co-accused who were acquitted due to insufficient evidence. The court upheld the 3-year rigorous imprisonment sentence and Rs. 10,000 fine, finding eyewitness testimony credible and rejecting arguments that investigative lapses warranted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge affirmed the trial court's conviction of Kumar under Section 420 IPC (cheating) for defrauding two complainants of Rs. 80,000 by selling them fake gold coins, rejecting the appellant's claim for acquittal based on parity with co-accused who were acquitted due to insufficient evidence. The court upheld the 3-year rigorous imprisonment sentence and Rs. 10,000 fine, finding eyewitness testimony credible and rejecting arguments that investigative lapses warranted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts