Canara Bank, Uppunda Branch vs Adil Ummer Saheb Advocate - Malyady Jayarama Shetty — 414/2023
Case under Rule 13 S R/w 177 Imv Act Section 68. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP400024312023
Next Hearing
17th July 2026
Filing Number
414/2023
Filing Date
23-01-2023
Registration No
414/2023
Registration Date
23-01-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,BAINDURU
Judge
1528-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Canara Bank, Uppunda Branch
Adv. K. Govindaraj Shenoy
Respondent(s)
Adil Ummer Saheb Advocate - Malyady Jayarama Shetty
Sameena Adit
Adv. Malyady Jayarama Shetty
Hearing History
Judge: 1528-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ISSUES
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 28-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-06-2025 | ISSUES |
| 21-03-2025 | ISSUES |
Interim Orders
This is a civil court order (O.S. No. 414/2023) from the Civil Judge and JMFC court in Belagavi (Karnataka), dated 28-11-2025. The witness Shri Dhanjay Kumar (age 37) was examined and sworn in on this date. The court admitted 15 documentary exhibits (marked as Exh. 1-15) including authority certificates, affidavits, contracts, guarantee agreements, and official receipts presented by the plaintiff's counsel. The defendant's counsel failed to appear, resulting in the case proceeding ex-parte with the witness's testimony recorded and cross-examination marked accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil court order (O.S. No. 414/2023) from the Civil Judge and JMFC court in Belagavi (Karnataka), dated 28-11-2025. The witness Shri Dhanjay Kumar (age 37) was examined and sworn in on this date. The court admitted 15 documentary exhibits (marked as Exh. 1-15) including authority certificates, affidavits, contracts, guarantee agreements, and official receipts presented by the plaintiff's counsel. The defendant's counsel failed to appear, resulting in the case proceeding ex-parte with the witness's testimony recorded and cross-examination marked accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts