Sri. Vittal vs Sri. Chandra Advocate - Balakrishna Shetty — 371/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 26, O 7, R 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP400018302023
Filing Number
371/2023
Filing Date
17-Jan-2023
Registration No
371/2023
Registration Date
17-Jan-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,BAINDURU
Judge
1528-CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri. Vittal
Adv. Madhava Rao Matti
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sri. Chandra Advocate - Balakrishna Shetty
-
2.Sri. Rama, 36 years
-
3.Sri. Laxman, 34 years
Adv. Balakrishna Shetty
-
4.Sri. Raghavendra, 32 years
Adv. Balakrishna Shetty
-
5.Sri. Veerabhadra, 30 years
Adv. Balakrishna Shetty
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jun-2025
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Mar-2025
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Dec-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Oct-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jul-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jul-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Jun-2024
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Mar-2024
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jan-2024
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2023
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Sep-2023
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jul-2023
For Amendment Of Plaint
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jun-2023
For Amendment Of Plaint
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Apr-2023
For Amendment Of Plaint
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Mar-2023
OrdersView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 371/2023 | Court of Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Bainduru | Dated: 31 March 2023 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No. VI) under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC to amend the plaint. The plaintiff Sri. Vittal is permitted to amend his original suit for delivery of vacant possession to include a relief for possession of the suit building based on subsequent legal developments, specifically the dismissal of the defendants' adverse possession claim in a prior suit (O.S. No. 11/2013). The court found the amendment necessary to determine the real controversy and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, with no prejudice to the defendants. The case is adjourned to 13 April 2023 for submission of the amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2023
For Amendment Of Plaint
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Mar-2023
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Feb-2023
For Reply
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Feb-2023
For Reply
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Feb-2023
For Reply
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Feb-2023
For Reply
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Feb-2023
For Reply
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Feb-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 371/2023
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 371/2023 | Court of Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Bainduru | Dated: 31 March 2023 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No. VI) under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC to amend the plaint. The plaintiff Sri. Vittal is permitted to amend his original suit for delivery of vacant possession to include a relief for possession of the suit building based on subsequent legal developments, specifically the dismissal of the defendants' adverse possession claim in a prior suit (O.S. No. 11/2013). The court found the amendment necessary to determine the real controversy and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, with no prejudice to the defendants. The case is adjourned to 13 April 2023 for submission of the amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts