Sri. Vittal vs Sri. Chandra Advocate - Balakrishna Shetty — 371/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 26, O 7, R 1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUP400018302023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

Filing Number

371/2023

Filing Date

17-01-2023

Registration No

371/2023

Registration Date

17-01-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,BAINDURU

Judge

1528-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 26, O 7, R 1

Petitioner(s)

Sri. Vittal

Adv. Madhava Rao Matti

Respondent(s)

Sri. Chandra Advocate - Balakrishna Shetty

Sri. Rama, 36 years

Sri. Laxman, 34 years

Adv. Balakrishna Shetty

Sri. Raghavendra, 32 years

Adv. Balakrishna Shetty

Sri. Veerabhadra, 30 years

Adv. Balakrishna Shetty

Hearing History

Judge: 1528-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

19-12-2025

EVIDENCE

22-09-2025

EVIDENCE

25-06-2025

ISSUES

28-03-2025

ISSUES

Interim Orders

31-03-2023
Orders

Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 371/2023 | Court of Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Bainduru | Dated: 31 March 2023 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No. VI) under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC to amend the plaint. The plaintiff Sri. Vittal is permitted to amend his original suit for delivery of vacant possession to include a relief for possession of the suit building based on subsequent legal developments, specifically the dismissal of the defendants' adverse possession claim in a prior suit (O.S. No. 11/2013). The court found the amendment necessary to determine the real controversy and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, with no prejudice to the defendants. The case is adjourned to 13 April 2023 for submission of the amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 371/2023 | Court of Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Bainduru | Dated: 31 March 2023 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No. VI) under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC to amend the plaint. The plaintiff Sri. Vittal is permitted to amend his original suit for delivery of vacant possession to include a relief for possession of the suit building based on subsequent legal developments, specifically the dismissal of the defendants' adverse possession claim in a prior suit (O.S. No. 11/2013). The court found the amendment necessary to determine the real controversy and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, with no prejudice to the defendants. The case is adjourned to 13 April 2023 for submission of the amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,BAINDURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case