Sri. Vittal vs Sri. Chandra Advocate - Balakrishna Shetty — 371/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 26, O 7, R 1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP400018302023
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
371/2023
Filing Date
17-01-2023
Registration No
371/2023
Registration Date
17-01-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,BAINDURU
Judge
1528-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. Vittal
Adv. Madhava Rao Matti
Respondent(s)
Sri. Chandra Advocate - Balakrishna Shetty
Sri. Rama, 36 years
Sri. Laxman, 34 years
Adv. Balakrishna Shetty
Sri. Raghavendra, 32 years
Adv. Balakrishna Shetty
Sri. Veerabhadra, 30 years
Adv. Balakrishna Shetty
Hearing History
Judge: 1528-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ISSUES
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 22-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 25-06-2025 | ISSUES |
| 28-03-2025 | ISSUES |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 371/2023 | Court of Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Bainduru | Dated: 31 March 2023 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No. VI) under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC to amend the plaint. The plaintiff Sri. Vittal is permitted to amend his original suit for delivery of vacant possession to include a relief for possession of the suit building based on subsequent legal developments, specifically the dismissal of the defendants' adverse possession claim in a prior suit (O.S. No. 11/2013). The court found the amendment necessary to determine the real controversy and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, with no prejudice to the defendants. The case is adjourned to 13 April 2023 for submission of the amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 371/2023 | Court of Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Bainduru | Dated: 31 March 2023 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No. VI) under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC to amend the plaint. The plaintiff Sri. Vittal is permitted to amend his original suit for delivery of vacant possession to include a relief for possession of the suit building based on subsequent legal developments, specifically the dismissal of the defendants' adverse possession claim in a prior suit (O.S. No. 11/2013). The court found the amendment necessary to determine the real controversy and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, with no prejudice to the defendants. The case is adjourned to 13 April 2023 for submission of the amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts